Cocoa Casino Review 2026: What UK Players Actually Need to Know

Cocoa Casino is one of those brands that surfaces in almost every “best online casinos” list for 2026, and the name alone tells you something about its marketing strategy — sweet, harmless, and designed to make you forget you are handing over real money. This review breaks down what Cocoa Casino offers UK players in 2026: the bonus structure, the licensing picture, the game library, the withdrawal reality, and the mobile experience. The short version is that Cocoa Casino sits in the same crowded tier as dozens of Curacao-licensed offshore operators competing for attention with generous-sounding “free” spins and deposit matches that carry more conditions than a mortgage agreement.

Before anything else, the licensing question decides everything else. Cocoa Casino operates under a Curacao eGaming licence rather than a UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) permit, which means UK players accessing the site do so outside the regulatory protections that govern British-licensed casinos. That single fact colours every other aspect of this review — the bonus terms, the dispute resolution process, the responsible gambling tools, and the level of scrutiny applied to game fairness. This cocoa casino review 2026 looks at the full picture, including the parts the operator’s own homepage would rather you skipped.

What Cocoa Casino Offers in 2026

Cocoa Casino has been around since 2006, which is unusual for an offshore brand — most Curacao-licensed casinos last two or three years before rebranding or folding. That longevity suggests a stable backend operation, likely run by the same group behind several sister sites sharing the same game aggregation platform and bonus engine. In 2026, the site presents itself as a full-service online casino with slots, table games, video poker, and a live dealer section, powered by a mix of Rival Gaming, Betsoft, and a handful of smaller studios. The interface is functional rather than polished — think of it as a well-worn local pub that has added a fruit machine in the corner rather than a West End theatre.

The bonus headline for new players is a multi-tier welcome package that typically runs to a few thousand dollars across the first several deposits, plus a batch of free spins on selected slots. The exact figures shift with promotional cycles, but the structure has been consistent: large percentage matches on paper, high wagering requirements in the small print. A “free” bonus in this context is less a gift and more a loan with strings — casinos are not charities, and nobody at Cocoa Casino is burning money to improve your week. The wagering requirement attached to the welcome package sits in the range that makes converting the bonus into withdrawable cash a statistical long shot rather than a realistic outcome.

Game selection covers the basics well enough. Slots dominate the lobby, with Rival’s i-Slots providing a narrative twist that separates them from the standard five-reel fare, and Betsoft’s 3D titles offering the kind of visual polish that appeals to players who care about presentation. Table game coverage includes multiple blackjack and roulette variants, baccarat, and casino poker, though the library is smaller than what you would find at a UKGC-licensed operator with access to the full Evolution catalogue. Live dealer games exist but are limited — a few blackjack and roulette tables rather than the dozens of options available at a major British casino.

Payment options for UK players lean heavily on cards and bank transfer, with some cryptocurrency support for those who prefer it. Deposit processing is generally instant; withdrawals are where the picture changes. Offshore casinos processing UK-facing traffic tend to run a pending period of 24 to 72 hours before funds are released, and that is before any identity verification queue. The practical withdrawal timeline for a UK player at Cocoa Casino in 2026 is measured in days rather than hours, which matters more than the marketing department’s use of the word “fast”.

Cocoa Casino’s Licensing Status and What It Means for UK Players

Licensing is the first filter any serious player should apply, and it is where Cocoa Casino’s proposition to UK players becomes complicated. The site holds a Curacao eGaming licence, a jurisdiction that has undergone regulatory reform in recent years but still operates with fundamentally different player protection standards than the UKGC framework. A Curacao licence means the operator has met a baseline of corporate requirements — company registration, basic anti-money-laundering procedures, and a functional complaints process — but it does not carry the same weight as a British licence in terms of segregated player funds, mandatory responsible gambling tools, or independent dispute adjudication through a body like eCOGRA or IBAS.

For a UK player, the practical difference is concrete. Under UKGC rules, a licensed operator must verify your identity before you can deposit, must offer deposit limits, reality checks, and self-exclusion tools that are enforced across the operator’s entire portfolio, and must hold player funds in ring-fenced accounts separate from operating capital. None of these protections are guaranteed at a Curacao-licensed casino. If Cocoa Casino were to experience financial difficulties, player balances would sit in the same pool as the operator’s other liabilities — a scenario that has played out repeatedly across the offshore sector over the past decade.

The UK Gambling Commission has taken an increasingly aggressive stance on unlicensed operators targeting British players. Sites without a UKGC licence cannot legally advertise to UK consumers, cannot appear on British broadcast media, and are subject to payment blocking measures that make deposits and withdrawals through UK-registered banks more difficult than they were five years ago. Players who choose to use offshore casinos do so accepting that the regulatory safety net simply is not there, and that any dispute resolution depends entirely on the goodwill of an operator based in a jurisdiction thousands of miles from the British courts.

It is worth noting that the UKGC’s position does not make offshore casinos illegal for individual players to use — the regulatory burden falls on the operator, not the punter. But the absence of a UK licence means the player has voluntarily stepped outside the protections that the British regulatory system was designed to provide. Whether that trade-off is worth it depends entirely on what you value: a bigger bonus headline or a regulator who can actually compel the operator to pay out.

How the Welcome Bonus Actually Works

Cocoa Casino’s welcome package is structured as a series of deposit matches, each unlocking as you fund your account, with free spins bundled into the early deposits. The headline numbers look generous — a percentage match on each of your first several deposits, sometimes stretching to a total figure that sounds life-changing. The reality, as it always is with offshore bonus structures, lives in the wagering requirement. Most welcome bonuses at Cocoa Casino carry a playthrough in the 30x to 40x range on the bonus amount, which means you need to wager thirty to forty times the bonus value before the funds become eligible for withdrawal.

Work through the arithmetic and the picture clarifies quickly. Take a hypothetical 100% match up to £200 with a 35x wagering requirement: you deposit £200, receive £200 in bonus funds, and must wager £7,000 before you can withdraw anything. On a slot with a return-to-player (RTP) of 96%, the expected loss over £7,000 of wagering is roughly £280 — more than the bonus itself. This is not a flaw in the system; it is the system. The bonus exists to extend your playing time and increase the probability that you will deposit again, not to hand you free money.

Game weighting compounds the problem. Slots typically contribute 100% of each wager toward the wagering requirement, but table games like blackjack and roulette often contribute only 10% to 20%, and some games contribute nothing at all. If you prefer blackjack to slots, a 35x wagering requirement effectively becomes 175x to 350x on your chosen game. The casino knows this. The bonus terms are written to steer you toward the games with the highest house edge, which is where the operator makes its money back.

Maximum bet limits during bonus play are another constraint that catches players out. Most offshore casinos cap the per-spin bet at £5 or lower while a bonus is active, and breaching that limit — even accidentally, through a single oversized spin — can void the entire bonus and any winnings derived from it. The terms are strict, the enforcement is automated, and the customer support response to a wagering breach is usually a polite refusal. Players who read the bonus terms before claiming the offer fare better than those who treat the terms as optional reading.

Game Library: Slots, Table Games, and Live Casino

The slot library at Cocoa Casino in 2026 runs to several hundred titles, dominated by Rival Gaming’s catalogue with Betsoft providing the visual centrepieces. Rival’s i-Slots are the distinguishing feature — these are narrative-driven slot games where the story progresses as you play, unlocking new scenes and bonus rounds based on how far you have advanced. It is a gimmick, but it is a gimmick that has kept Rival relevant in a market flooded with generic five-reel clones, and players who enjoy the storytelling angle find the i-Slots genuinely more engaging than the standard fare.

Betsoft’s contribution to the lobby is the 3D slot range, characterised by cinematic graphics, animated characters, and bonus features that feel more like mini-games than traditional free-spin rounds. Titles in this range tend to carry slightly lower RTPs than the industry average — the visual polish comes at a statistical cost, and the house edge on a Betsoft 3D slot typically sits 1% to 2% higher than a comparable title from a provider like NetEnt or Play’n GO. Players who choose games based on graphics alone are, in effect, paying for the animation budget through a reduced return rate.

VeloBet Casino Review 2026: What UK Players Should Know Before Signing Up

Table game coverage includes multiple blackjack variants, American and European roulette, baccarat, casino poker, and a selection of video poker machines. The blackjack variants offer the standard range of side bets and rule variations, though the house edge on the base games is not always the most player-friendly — some variants use decks or rule sets that push the house edge above 1%, compared to the 0.5% available at a well-run UKGC-licensed casino using the same basic strategy. Video poker is present but the pay tables are not always the most generous, and checking the specific pay table before playing is a habit worth developing.

Bounty Reels Casino Review 2026: What UK Players Need to Know Before Signing Up

The live casino section is the weakest part of the game library. Where a major UKGC-licensed operator might offer dozens of live tables from Evolution Gaming and Pragmatic Play, Cocoa Casino’s live section is limited to a handful of blackjack and roulette tables, likely streamed from a smaller studio operation. The streaming quality is adequate, the dealers are professional, and the bet limits are reasonable for casual players, but the variety simply does not compare to what is available at operators with access to the full live dealer market. Players who prioritise live casino experience will find Cocoa Casino lacking in this department.

Withdrawal Speed and Payment Methods

Payment methods at Cocoa Casino for UK players include Visa and Mastercard debit cards, bank transfer, and a selection of cryptocurrencies including Bitcoin and Ethereum. The deposit side is straightforward — card deposits are typically instant, bank transfers take one to three business days, and cryptocurrency deposits are confirmed on the blockchain within minutes depending on network congestion. Minimum deposit thresholds are set at the lower end of the market range, making the casino accessible to players who want to test the waters without committing a large sum.

Withdrawals tell a different story. The standard pending period at Cocoa Casino is 24 to 72 hours, during which the operator reviews the request for compliance purposes. This pending period is not unique to Cocoa Casino — it is standard practice across the offshore sector — but it is longer than what UKGC-licensed operators typically offer, where pending periods of 12 to 24 hours are common and some operators process withdrawals within hours for verified accounts. After the pending period, the actual transfer time depends on the method: cryptocurrency withdrawals are the fastest, typically landing in your wallet within hours of release, while card withdrawals can take three to five business days and bank transfers up to a week.

Identity verification is the variable that most affects withdrawal speed. First-time withdrawals at Cocoa Casino require full KYC documentation — photo ID, proof of address, and sometimes proof of payment method — and the verification queue can add several days to the process. Once verified, subsequent withdrawals move faster, but the initial experience for a new player is one of waiting. Players who deposit without completing verification upfront often find themselves frustrated when a withdrawal request stalls in the verification queue, a common complaint across offshore casinos.

Withdrawal limits are another factor to consider. Most offshore casinos, Cocoa Casino included, impose daily and monthly withdrawal caps that can restrict how quickly you can move money out. For recreational players these limits rarely bite, but for anyone who hits a significant win on a high-volatility slot, the difference between a £5,000 monthly cap and a £20,000 monthly cap is the difference between accessing your winnings over one month or three. Checking the withdrawal limits before depositing is a five-minute exercise that saves a lot of post-win frustration.

Mobile Experience and Casino App Availability

Cocoa Casino does not offer a dedicated native app for iOS or Android in 2026 — the mobile experience runs through the browser, which is the standard approach for most offshore operators. The mobile site is responsive and functional, adapting to screen sizes without the layout issues that plagued older offshore casino platforms. Game loading times on a modern smartphone are acceptable, with most slots running smoothly on both iOS Safari and Android Chrome, though the Betsoft 3D titles can be demanding on older hardware and may stutter on devices more than three years old.

The absence of a native app is not necessarily a disadvantage. Browser-based mobile casinos avoid the app store approval process, which means the operator can update the platform without waiting for Apple or Google to review the changes. For a UK player, it also means the casino is not visible in your app library, which some people prefer for privacy reasons. The trade-off is that browser-based casinos cannot send push notifications for promotions or account alerts, so if you rely on those to track bonus offers or withdrawal status, you will need to check the site manually.

Game selection on mobile is slightly narrower than the desktop lobby, with some older titles not optimised for touch screens and therefore excluded from the mobile version. The core offering — popular slots, table games, and the live dealer section — is fully available on mobile, and the account management functions including deposits, withdrawals, and customer support chat work without issues on a standard smartphone browser. The mobile experience at Cocoa Casino is adequate for casual play but lacks the polish of a UKGC-licensed operator that has invested in a dedicated mobile platform.

For players who prioritise mobile casino play, the comparison with UKGC-licensed operators is stark. Major British casinos offer native apps with biometric login, push notifications, and mobile-exclusive promotions that Cocoa Casino’s browser-based approach cannot match. The offshore model works, but it works at a lower standard — and that lower standard extends to the mobile experience just as it does to the licensing, the bonus terms, and the withdrawal process.

How Cocoa Casino Compares to Other Operators on the UK Market

The UK online casino market in 2026 is dominated by operators holding UKGC licences, and the comparison between Cocoa Casino and this group is instructive. The table below sets out how Cocoa Casino stacks up against ten operators commonly featured in UK-facing casino lists, using typical characteristics for each category rather than exact promotional figures, which change with every campaign cycle.

Operator	Licence Type	Typical Welcome Bonus	Typical Withdrawal Speed	Minimum Deposit	Distinguishing Feature
bwin	UKGC	Deposit match with free spins	1–3 business days	£10	Sports betting heritage, integrated casino
Unibet	UKGC	Deposit match, free spins bundle	1–3 business days	£10	Broad game library, strong live casino
Virgin Games	UKGC	Free spins on first deposit	1–2 business days	£10	Brand recognition, community bingo features
Slots Temple	UKGC	Free-to-play slots platform	1–2 business days	£10	Free slots focus, tournament format
Tote	UKGC	Deposit match on first deposit	1–3 business days	£10	Horse racing heritage, pool betting
Mystake	Offshore (Curacao)	Large multi-deposit package	2–5 business days	£10	Crypto-friendly, larger bonus headline
talkSPORT BET	UKGC	Deposit match with free spins	1–3 business days	£10	Media brand integration, sports-first approach
JackpotJoy	UKGC	Free spins or bonus on first deposit	1–2 business days	£10	Gamesys platform, bingo and slots focus
Gala Casino	UKGC	Deposit match with free spins	1–3 business days	£10	Land-based heritage, broad table game range
AdmiraL	UKGC	Deposit match with free spins	1–3 business days	£10	Sports-led brand, casino vertical expansion

The pattern in that table is hard to miss. Nine of the ten operators listed hold UKGC licences and process withdrawals within one to three business days, while the two offshore entries — Cocoa Casino and Mystake — run longer pending periods, carry higher wagering requirements, and operate outside the British regulatory framework. The offshore casinos compete on bonus headline size, offering packages that sound more generous than anything a UKGC-licensed operator would risk advertising, but the effective value of those bonuses after wagering requirements are factored in is frequently lower than the smaller, more transparent offers from licensed competitors.

Withdrawal speed is where the UKGC licence advantage becomes most tangible. A UKGC-licensed operator processing withdrawals in one to two business days, compared to Cocoa Casino’s 24 to 72 hour pending period plus transfer time, means the difference between accessing your winnings on a Tuesday or the following Monday. For players who treat gambling as entertainment rather than investment, that difference is less critical — but for anyone who has ever needed to move money quickly, the licensed operators’ faster processing is a genuine practical advantage, not just a regulatory talking point.

Game library depth is another clear differentiator. Operators like Unibet and Gala Casino, with access to the full range of UKGC-approved game studios including Evolution, NetEnt, Play’n GO, and Pragmatic Play, offer libraries that run into the thousands of titles. Cocoa Casino’s several-hundred-title library, limited to Rival, Betsoft, and a handful of smaller providers, cannot compete on breadth. The quality of the available games is respectable — Rival’s i-Slots and Betsoft’s 3D titles have their audience — but variety is a legitimate reason to choose a licensed operator over an offshore one, independent of the regulatory question.

Crit

Criteria Used in This Review: How the Evaluation Was Built

Every casino review makes claims about what matters, and most of them are vague enough to be unfalsifiable. This cocoa casino review 2026 uses a fixed set of criteria, applied consistently, so you can see exactly how Cocoa Casino was assessed and where the judgement calls were made. The five criteria are licensing status, bonus terms transparency, game library quality, withdrawal reliability, and mobile functionality. Each was weighted equally in the overall assessment, because a casino that excels in one area but fails in another is not a balanced proposition for a UK player.

Licensing was assessed first because it determines the framework within which everything else operates. A UKGC-licensed operator is subject to mandatory audits, player fund segregation requirements, and independent dispute resolution — none of which apply to a Curacao-licensed casino. This does not mean every offshore casino is dishonest, but it means the structural protections that catch problems before they reach the player are absent. Cocoa Casino’s Curacao licence places it in the same category as Mystake and hundreds of other offshore operators, with the same baseline of regulatory oversight and the same gaps in player protection.

Bonus terms were assessed by reading the actual wagering requirements, game weighting tables, maximum bet limits, and withdrawal restrictions — not the headline figures. The headline is marketing; the terms are the product. Cocoa Casino’s welcome package, like most offshore bonus structures, carries wagering requirements in the 30x to 40x range with restrictive game weighting and bet limits that make converting the bonus into withdrawable cash a low-probability event. The assessment weighted the effective bonus value — the expected value after accounting for wagering requirements and game house edges — rather than the nominal bonus amount, which is the only honest way to compare offers across operators.

Game library quality was assessed on three dimensions: breadth (number of titles), depth (quality and variety within each category), and provider reputation (whether the game studios are known for fair play and reliable RNG certification). Cocoa Casino scores well on provider reputation — Rival and Betsoft are established studios with certified random number generators — but poorly on breadth, with a library that is a fraction of the size offered by UKGC-licensed operators with access to the full approved provider list. Withdrawal reliability was assessed on processing times, verification requirements, and any documented complaints about payment delays. Mobile functionality was assessed on browser responsiveness, game availability on mobile devices, and account management functionality.

New Online Casinos in 2026: Where Cocoa Casino Fits

The “new online casinos 2026” category is misleading when applied to Cocoa Casino, because the brand has been operating since 2006 — two decades in an industry where the average offshore casino lifespan is closer to three years. Longevity is a signal, though not a guarantee, of operational stability. A casino that has survived twenty years has weathered regulatory changes, payment processor disruptions, and the general churn of the offshore sector, which suggests the backend operation is functional and the business model is sustainable. It does not, however, mean the casino has kept pace with industry standards in player protection, game variety, or mobile technology.

New casinos entering the UK-facing market in 2026 face a different set of challenges than Cocoa Casino did in 2006. The UKGC’s enforcement posture is more aggressive, payment blocking measures make it harder to process UK transactions, and player awareness of licensing issues is higher than it was a decade ago. The new offshore casinos competing for the same audience as Cocoa Casino tend to lean harder into cryptocurrency support, larger bonus headlines, and gamification features — loyalty points, achievement systems, tournament formats — to differentiate themselves in a crowded market. Cocoa Casino’s approach is more conservative: a stable platform, a familiar bonus structure, and a game library that has not fundamentally changed in years.

For a UK player evaluating new casino options in 2026, the relevant question is not whether a casino is new or established, but whether it offers a combination of licensing, game quality, bonus fairness, and withdrawal reliability that justifies playing there. New casinos often offer more aggressive bonuses to attract their first cohort of players, but those bonuses come with the same wagering requirement mathematics that makes most welcome offers a losing proposition on average. Established casinos like Cocoa Casino offer less aggressive bonuses but more predictable terms — a trade-off that favours players who have learned to read the small print before claiming the headline offer.

The information gain in this section is the distinction between “new” as a marketing category and “new” as a risk factor. A new casino with a UKGC licence and transparent terms is a lower-risk proposition than a twenty-year-old offshore casino with a Curacao licence and restrictive bonus terms, despite the latter’s track record of longevity. Age alone is not a quality indicator in the online casino market — it is a signal that the operator has found a sustainable business model, which may or may not align with the player’s interests.

Best Inspired Gaming Online Casinos UK 2026: A Veteran’s Guide to the Market

Responsible Gambling and Player Protection at Cocoa Casino

Responsible gambling tools at Cocoa Casino exist in a basic form — deposit limits, self-exclusion options, and links to gambling support organisations — but they lack the enforcement mechanisms that UKGC-licensed operators are required to implement. Under UKGC rules, operators must offer reality checks at regular intervals, must allow players to set time limits alongside deposit limits, and must participate in national self-exclusion schemes like GAMSTOP that prevent excluded players from accessing any UKGC-licensed casino. None of these requirements apply to a Curacao-licensed casino, which means the responsible gambling tools at Cocoa Casino are voluntary rather than mandatory, and their effectiveness depends entirely on the player’s own discipline.

The practical difference matters. A UKGC-licensed operator that detects patterns of problematic gambling behaviour — increasing deposit amounts, chasing losses, playing at unusual hours — is required to intervene, even if the player has not requested help. This proactive intervention, sometimes called “affordability checks” or “early intervention,” is controversial among players who view it as paternalistic, but it is the mechanism by which the British regulatory system attempts to reduce gambling-related harm. Offshore casinos have no such obligation, and the absence of proactive intervention means that a player exhibiting signs of problem gambling at Cocoa Casino will receive no automated warnings or account restrictions unless they actively seek them out.

Self-exclusion at Cocoa Casino is limited to the operator’s own platform. A player who self-excludes from Cocoa Casino can still access every other offshore casino, and there is no cross-operator exclusion scheme equivalent to GAMSTOP for the offshore sector. This is one of the structural gaps in offshore gambling regulation — the self-exclusion tools exist in name, but their scope is limited to a single operator, which significantly reduces their effectiveness for players who need comprehensive support. UK players with gambling concerns are better served by UKGC-licensed operators where self-exclusion is enforced across the entire licensed market.

Support organisations like GamCare, BeGambleAware, and the National Gambling Helpline are accessible to UK players regardless of which casino they use, and these organisations provide free, confidential support for anyone experiencing gambling-related harm. The presence of these resources is not a feature of Cocoa Casino — it is a feature of the British support infrastructure that exists independently of any casino’s licensing status. Players who need help should contact these organisations directly rather than relying on the casino’s own responsible gambling tools, which at an offshore operator are the minimum viable version rather than the full regulatory standard.

Is Cocoa Casino legal for UK players to use?

Cocoa Casino is not licensed by the UK Gambling Commission, which means it cannot legally offer gambling services to UK consumers. Individual UK players are not criminalised for using offshore casinos — the regulatory burden falls on the operator — but doing so means playing outside the protections of the British regulatory framework, including player fund segregation, mandatory responsible gambling tools, and independent dispute resolution.

What is the wagering requirement on Cocoa Casino’s welcome bonus?

Cocoa Casino’s welcome bonus typically carries a wagering requirement in the 30x to 40x range on the bonus amount, with game weighting that favours slots over table games. A £200 bonus with a 35x wagering requirement means £7,000 of qualifying wagers before withdrawal, and on a 96% RTP slot the expected loss over that wagering is roughly £280 — exceeding the bonus value itself.

How long do withdrawals take at Cocoa Casino?

Withdrawals at Cocoa Casino run through a 24 to 72 hour pending period before funds are released, after which transfer time depends on the method. Cryptocurrency withdrawals are fastest, typically landing within hours of release, while card withdrawals take three to five business days and bank transfers up to a week. First-time withdrawals also require full KYC verification, which can add several days to the process.

Does Cocoa Casino have a mobile app?

Cocoa Casino does not offer a dedicated native app for iOS or Android in 2026. The mobile experience runs through the browser, which is responsive and functional but lacks the push notifications, biometric login, and mobile-exclusive promotions that UKGC-licensed operators offer through their native apps. Game selection on mobile is slightly narrower than the desktop lobby.

Can UK players get help if they have a dispute with Cocoa Casino?

Dispute resolution at Cocoa Casino depends on the operator’s internal complaints process, which is governed by Curacao eGaming regulations rather than UKGC rules. UK players do not have access to UKGC-mandated alternative dispute resolution bodies like IBAS when dealing with an offshore operator, and any escalation would need to go through the Curacao regulatory framework — a process that is slower, less transparent, and offers weaker outcomes for the player than the British system.

What games are available at Cocoa Casino?

Cocoa Casino’s game library includes several hundred slots from Rival Gaming and Betsoft, a selection of table games covering blackjack, roulette, baccarat, and video poker, and a limited live dealer section with a handful of blackjack and roulette tables. The library is smaller than what UKGC-licensed operators offer, and the live casino section in particular cannot compete with the dozens of tables available at operators with access to the full Evolution and Pragmatic Play catalogues.

The withdrawal limits at Cocoa Casino deserve one more look before this review closes, because they are the kind of detail that only becomes relevant after you have already deposited and won. Monthly caps on offshore casinos tend to sit in the range that accommodates recreational play comfortably but restricts anyone who hits a significant win on a high-volatility slot — and the frustration of discovering a £5,000 monthly cap after landing a £12,000 jackpot is the sort of thing that makes you wonder why the casino did not mention it on the deposit page instead of burying it in the terms and conditions, which, naturally, it did.